There has been much recent debate in the UK, especially after the Brexit vote and the American presidential election, about the accuracy of claims made by politicians and the ways in which these are reported, understood and spread (particularly on social media and online news outlets, but also in relation to the mainstream media). A recent Yougov poll (2016) reported that most young people now access news online, often via social media platforms and often on smartphones. However, teachers may experience and use digital tools and platforms differently from their students, for example they are more likely to use Facebook or Twitter than Snapchat or Instagram, being relatively older (Ofcom, 2016).
Teachers enjoy access to masses of online information and useful resources, but they may have difficulty finding the time to select appropriate resources (Reilly & Niens, 2009). Moreover, while they may be aware of so-called fake news, political bias and often hate speech in online content, some teachers may believe they lack relevant skills and knowledge to enable them to tackle such issues in the classroom. In addition, teachers have concerns over online safeguarding and young people are often protected at home and in school by parental controls and firewalls, which may nevertheless often be circumvented.
This array of circumstances has led to rapid proliferation of online resources for teachers, many of which are relatively primitive tools such as checklists. The curriculum, however, aims to equip young people with transferable skills which enable them to become active participants in society, but little is currently known about the extent to which skills such as information literacy and critical thinking are applied when young people are online.
The successful applicant will develop an application to conduct a qualitative and/or quantitative research project addressing the above issues in the light of teacher and pupil perceptions around relevant skills, some of which permeate the curriculum while others may be more prominent in subject areas such as geography, history, citizenship and politics. Applications should be around 2000 words, and should contextualise the project in academic literature, outline proposed methods, consider relevant ethical issues and outline expected outcomes in terms of research impact.
Applicants should hold, or expect to obtain, a First or Upper Second Class Honours Degree in a subject relevant to the proposed area of study.
We may also consider applications from those who hold equivalent qualifications, for example, a Lower Second Class Honours Degree plus a Master’s Degree with Distinction.
In exceptional circumstances, the University may consider a portfolio of evidence from applicants who have appropriate professional experience which is equivalent to the learning outcomes of an Honours degree in lieu of academic qualifications.
If the University receives a large number of applicants for the project, the following desirable criteria may be applied to shortlist applicants for interview.
The University offers the following levels of support:
The scholarship will cover tuition fees at the Home rate and a maintenance allowance of £19,000 (tbc) per annum for three years (subject to satisfactory academic performance).
This scholarship also comes with £900 per annum for three years as a research training support grant (RTSG) allocation to help support the PhD researcher.
Due consideration should be given to financing your studies. Further information on cost of living
Submission deadline
Monday 19 February 2018
12:00AM
Interview Date
31st March 2018
Preferred student start date
mid September 2018