|
|
EXTERNAL EXAMINERS
External examiners are academic subject or professional experts appointed from outside the University. Their key functions are to contribute to the assurance of the standards of awards and to ensure that students are treated fairly in the assessment process. The External Examiners' Handbook contains detailed information on their role and responsibilities. Role of Course/Subject External Examiner The University appoints at least one external examiner for each award-bearing course or undergraduate Honours subject. They are involved in the approval and moderation of examination papers and other forms of assessment, and in the moderation of student work and its marking by internal examiners. They are members of boards of examiners which finalise students' results and, where applicable, make recommendations for awards. The University also expects course/subject committees to consult the external examiner when proposing changes to the content, structure or regulations for a course or subject strand during its period of approval. Normally each module is the responsibility of only one external examiner. Role of Chief External Examiner For subject-based Honours degree provision, where different subjects may be combined for Major/Minor, Joint and/or Combined (three Minor) Honours awards, a two-tier system of external examining and boards of examiners operates. Results of candidates in each subject are considered by a subject board of examiners and are moderated by a subject external examiner. They are then forwarded to a campus progress and award board of examiners. This board includes a chief external examiner who is concerned with ensuring fairness and impartiality in the application of award regulations and procedures. Academic Office The Academic Office is responsible for reviewing nominations of external examiners made by Faculty Boards. It maintains the University's External Examiners' Handbook and Code of Practice on External Examining. Procedure for External Examiner Nomination and Appointment Course/Subject External Examiner
Chief External Examiner
Procedures to be Followed in the Absence of an External Examiner External examiners are required to attend meetings of Boards of Examiners of which they are members where results that contribute to final awards are being considered. Should an external examiner be unable to attend a meeting of the Board, the Course/Subject Director shall submit a completed pro forma containing proposals for moderating students' work and for approving results to the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching and Learning) for her approval. Termination of Appointment The University may terminate an appointment early, if an external examiner fails to fulfill his or her duties, for example through non-attendance at Boards of Examiners where required, non-submission of annual report (see below), or provision of false information. If a potential conflict of interest should arise following appointment, the external examiner should contact the Examinations Office. The particular circumstances will be discussed within the University and an appropriate decision taken. External Examiner's Report External examiners provide an annual report to the University. This considers standards in relation to assessment, student performance, comparability with other programmes at the same level elsewhere, and other comments as appropriate. Reports are received by the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching and Learning) and distributed by the Examinations Office to Faculties and partner institutions for response and action as appropriate. They are formally considered as part of the annual monitoring process - Programme Management system (internal courses) or annual course review (external) - and the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching and Learning) provides an annual report on general issues to the Teaching and Learning Committee. A written response to the report is sent to the external examiner within three months of receipt. The report and the response to it are discussed with student representatives on the course/subject or staff/student consultative committee, or through an alternative means of consultation in part-time courses. A summary report may be provided where there are several externals. From 2011/12 the full report is to be available to all students of the course. No fee is paid until the report is received. The following procedures are followed if the report is inadequate in its coverage or not submitted in time: Incomplete/brief report This requires professional judgement by the Faculty which should request a fuller report by a given date. Failure to submit in time Reports should be submitted within one month of the Board of Examiners. For reports expected in June/July:
Forms Course/Subject External Examiner Chief External Examiner
If you have any comments on these webpages, please send
them to: |